Dr. Prasad, you are a treasure. The wave of social media blasts declaring near cures from this are not small. But, as your voice accurately shows, it's not......
But, what does Ben Sasse's potential admirable qualities have to regard anything? One, because it shouldn't matter. And, next, because he had a chance to stop at that point an only slightly corrupt President during the Ukraine treason impeachment and didn't. Next, his UF Presidency stint was rife of the objectively wasteful overspending upon Washington based education consultations and nepotism make-work someone like you would critique soundly.
None of that means he deserves to die or suffer, but "admirable"? Perhaps he was doing it for some greater type of good that you are privy to? Because, that's not a descriptor I'd use. Only harp upon it because you worked for scoundrels and crooks (not Makary and he's where you are) and were hoping it would be different and it was not.
*There is a large-ish subset of people out there who adore data-driven truth and are classically conservative politically and get concerned over "thought police" and "political correctness" who simply can't support this outright grifting and fraud based administration for it's corruption, lies, and objective ineptitude -- you should be one of them.
About point 2, this should be outcome based. For OS, they tracked down 32 of 38 patients so the patients are analyzed within their randomized group and IMO, not a high risk of bias.
Whereas for the PFS, they did not have the imaging data , hence they are missing or censored which is certainly high risk of bias.
Nice to have back your thoughts like this
Dr. Prasad, you are a treasure. The wave of social media blasts declaring near cures from this are not small. But, as your voice accurately shows, it's not......
But, what does Ben Sasse's potential admirable qualities have to regard anything? One, because it shouldn't matter. And, next, because he had a chance to stop at that point an only slightly corrupt President during the Ukraine treason impeachment and didn't. Next, his UF Presidency stint was rife of the objectively wasteful overspending upon Washington based education consultations and nepotism make-work someone like you would critique soundly.
None of that means he deserves to die or suffer, but "admirable"? Perhaps he was doing it for some greater type of good that you are privy to? Because, that's not a descriptor I'd use. Only harp upon it because you worked for scoundrels and crooks (not Makary and he's where you are) and were hoping it would be different and it was not.
*There is a large-ish subset of people out there who adore data-driven truth and are classically conservative politically and get concerned over "thought police" and "political correctness" who simply can't support this outright grifting and fraud based administration for it's corruption, lies, and objective ineptitude -- you should be one of them.
Great points Vinay!
About point 2, this should be outcome based. For OS, they tracked down 32 of 38 patients so the patients are analyzed within their randomized group and IMO, not a high risk of bias.
Whereas for the PFS, they did not have the imaging data , hence they are missing or censored which is certainly high risk of bias.