Myocarditis is one of many adverse events reported with this vaccine. Why are we talking about mitigation of the vaccine adverse events. We shouldn't even be giving this to young people. So now we add the various adverse events due to the vaccine to the problems with covid 19 since the vaccine doesn't prevent the illness. We seem to continue to pretend that this vaccine is safe and effective. It is not. Was there a recent article out of Japan about ADE? Is this page, https://www.jessicasuniverse.com/ , just completely false. This is directly from VAERS. I'm an almost 73 yo who had this virus a couple of months ago, no vaccine, and I think I'm fine afterward. My wife the same. If the VAERS data is typical then there are many more problems than reported.
Test lower doses in the high risk demographic group
Reconsider boosters in the high risk demographic group"
These products do no good, kill people, cause miscarriage and impair fertility, and drive ADE. How are you still promoting them in any form or timing???
Easy to answer your first question. By using a young girl(less common victim of the adverse side effects), they are defecting the demographic away from teenage-young adult males as the demographic and can still make money on getting them the jab. Males will experience the symptoms, but not believe that they are at risk of serious disease because the ad is for a young girl, not them. This ad is very calculated.
It’s clear the shots were oversold and need to be pulled off the market. They aren’t safe or effective. I’m guessing you agree, but you cannot comfortably say it yet.
Watch the ad. It is so profoundly sick: validating essentially hooking human beings up to a permanently necessary life support system in order to make money in the face of minimal risks is the furthest thing from ethical medicine.
Medicine should always be about less of it. Not more.
The ad isn't unfortunate. It's bat $hit crazy. I mean how much myocarditis are they seeing that they thought an ad had an ROI? I can't wait to see what shakes out with Rand Paul's promise to compel who was getting royalties.
If an organization wanted to make an ad that legitimizes multiple conspiracy theories in the minds of many and jeopardizes public health at the same time, this is exactly the death ad they would produce.
Unbelievably sick. This is enough to make a reasonable person cry. Next they'll have a 40 year old man talking about the heart attack that didn't kill him because of his great medical team and show him camping with his family. Or better yet, have his daughters talk about the myocarditis that is easily treated, as well as the father (given that the son is dead already). Amazing that the hospital marketing people don't see that this kind of propaganda promotes avoidance of their "services" and the jab, rather than seeking them out. The fact that a child's parents allowed their daughter to be in this ad and that child protection isn't involved says a lot about how we look at kids and safety now. Wow.
I don’t know how this would ever happen without a clean sweep of these organizations. Everyone needs to go - they can re-apply for their job if they like it but anyone that had Covid-policy making power or influence needs to G-O Go!
Now every parent in NYC, already the highest anxiety level city from COVID, will bring their child to the ER or doctor when they have some sort of virus, even GI, and think it is myocarditis. Sad how these past two years have taught so little to the medical community. Thanks for pointing many of these illogical absurdities out. Hopefully they will cause a mindset change.
Two things will happen with that scenario. 1. Myocarditis will be found that would not have been found if the parents were not paranoid or 2. The doctors will ignore the parents and not check for heart issues and children will be in serious jeopardy. I hope for the first, but will assume that the 2nd will be more likely.
I wonder how much has already been ignored, or how much subclinical myocarditis (as was seen in the recent actual study done in Thailand) is out there and if there will be unforeseen long term consequences. You can’t see what you aren’t looking for and unfortunately too many physicians bought the “safe and effective” lines on the medicine and then are baffled when they see “unexplained” sudden adult death, myocarditis in kids, strokes in younger than usual adults, etc. If it is not on your radar to consider the vaccine, you won’t
Completely agree, this is perverse. This needs to be prospectively followed way past the 90 day mark for long term consequences, and not sure why we are continuously vaccinating young people who are such low risk and have such a high seroprevalence of immunity.. It seems like the goalpost of vaccination moved from “good enough” immunity, good enough to keep you out of the hospital, off O2, out of the ICU, no ventilator no death to the goal-and CDC likes to state -“best immunity”=prevention of all infection. This seems completely unrealistic, but now patients are angry if they were vaccinated, boosted and get infected. You aren’t on the ventilator! Not only are these subsequent variants less deadly but the shots keep you out of the hospital. I dread what long term myocarditis follow up studies on these young men will show…
Myocarditis is one of many adverse events reported with this vaccine. Why are we talking about mitigation of the vaccine adverse events. We shouldn't even be giving this to young people. So now we add the various adverse events due to the vaccine to the problems with covid 19 since the vaccine doesn't prevent the illness. We seem to continue to pretend that this vaccine is safe and effective. It is not. Was there a recent article out of Japan about ADE? Is this page, https://www.jessicasuniverse.com/ , just completely false. This is directly from VAERS. I'm an almost 73 yo who had this virus a couple of months ago, no vaccine, and I think I'm fine afterward. My wife the same. If the VAERS data is typical then there are many more problems than reported.
"Space the two doses Apart.
Test lower doses in the high risk demographic group
Reconsider boosters in the high risk demographic group"
These products do no good, kill people, cause miscarriage and impair fertility, and drive ADE. How are you still promoting them in any form or timing???
Pressures of medical establishment most likely. We were all brainwashed to never question any vaccinations and to judge harshly those who dare to.
Easy to answer your first question. By using a young girl(less common victim of the adverse side effects), they are defecting the demographic away from teenage-young adult males as the demographic and can still make money on getting them the jab. Males will experience the symptoms, but not believe that they are at risk of serious disease because the ad is for a young girl, not them. This ad is very calculated.
It’s clear the shots were oversold and need to be pulled off the market. They aren’t safe or effective. I’m guessing you agree, but you cannot comfortably say it yet.
Watch the ad. It is so profoundly sick: validating essentially hooking human beings up to a permanently necessary life support system in order to make money in the face of minimal risks is the furthest thing from ethical medicine.
Medicine should always be about less of it. Not more.
Your best rant to date.
The ad isn't unfortunate. It's bat $hit crazy. I mean how much myocarditis are they seeing that they thought an ad had an ROI? I can't wait to see what shakes out with Rand Paul's promise to compel who was getting royalties.
If an organization wanted to make an ad that legitimizes multiple conspiracy theories in the minds of many and jeopardizes public health at the same time, this is exactly the death ad they would produce.
Unbelievably sick. This is enough to make a reasonable person cry. Next they'll have a 40 year old man talking about the heart attack that didn't kill him because of his great medical team and show him camping with his family. Or better yet, have his daughters talk about the myocarditis that is easily treated, as well as the father (given that the son is dead already). Amazing that the hospital marketing people don't see that this kind of propaganda promotes avoidance of their "services" and the jab, rather than seeking them out. The fact that a child's parents allowed their daughter to be in this ad and that child protection isn't involved says a lot about how we look at kids and safety now. Wow.
Perfectly reasonable suggestions. I hope that someday, FDA/CDC will take this approach to all the products that need approval.
I don’t know how this would ever happen without a clean sweep of these organizations. Everyone needs to go - they can re-apply for their job if they like it but anyone that had Covid-policy making power or influence needs to G-O Go!
Now every parent in NYC, already the highest anxiety level city from COVID, will bring their child to the ER or doctor when they have some sort of virus, even GI, and think it is myocarditis. Sad how these past two years have taught so little to the medical community. Thanks for pointing many of these illogical absurdities out. Hopefully they will cause a mindset change.
Two things will happen with that scenario. 1. Myocarditis will be found that would not have been found if the parents were not paranoid or 2. The doctors will ignore the parents and not check for heart issues and children will be in serious jeopardy. I hope for the first, but will assume that the 2nd will be more likely.
I wonder how much has already been ignored, or how much subclinical myocarditis (as was seen in the recent actual study done in Thailand) is out there and if there will be unforeseen long term consequences. You can’t see what you aren’t looking for and unfortunately too many physicians bought the “safe and effective” lines on the medicine and then are baffled when they see “unexplained” sudden adult death, myocarditis in kids, strokes in younger than usual adults, etc. If it is not on your radar to consider the vaccine, you won’t
Completely agree, this is perverse. This needs to be prospectively followed way past the 90 day mark for long term consequences, and not sure why we are continuously vaccinating young people who are such low risk and have such a high seroprevalence of immunity.. It seems like the goalpost of vaccination moved from “good enough” immunity, good enough to keep you out of the hospital, off O2, out of the ICU, no ventilator no death to the goal-and CDC likes to state -“best immunity”=prevention of all infection. This seems completely unrealistic, but now patients are angry if they were vaccinated, boosted and get infected. You aren’t on the ventilator! Not only are these subsequent variants less deadly but the shots keep you out of the hospital. I dread what long term myocarditis follow up studies on these young men will show…