Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeffrey Kocher MD's avatar

The Law of Unintended Consequences may of course make itself apparent in some unpleasant way a few years hence. We need only look at the Public Health campaign to lower salt intake. Important for a percentage of the population with heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and sodium responsive hypertension-(Gee it must be good for everyone went the logic). Turns out salt restricting people without a good indication causes many of them to eat more calories and gain weight. The campaign to “adaquately treat every patient’s pain”, came complete with government mandated patient feedback on how quickly and completely their pain was relieved, and this affected institutional reimbursement from Medicare and Medicaid via hospital quality assessments which were publicly available. Would you be surprised if that contributed to the over prescribing of narcotics and was a factor in the explosion of prescription drug addiction? And certainly we saw enormous societal damage during the COVID pandemic as the Law ran rampant.

See, “Clear and Present Thinking” on Substack: https://substack.com/@jeffreykocher/note/p-215268577?r=nf8t4&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action

Melissa James's avatar

I was actually in this study (in the lowest dose group which I only know because while experimental vs. placebo was blinded, dosing was not as we had to draw different amounts of fluid from the vial) and I don’t particularly remember having any elevated heart rate, but I definitely remember losing approximately 30% of my body weight in the span of a year (starting BMI roughly 37).

For whatever it’s worth, two pregnancies and four years later, and I have still kept off just over half of the weight I lost. I’m looking forward to using Retratrutide once more to finish losing all the weight I wanted to lose. From the weight I was at pre-study, I wanted to lose 40%, so I never quite got there before the study ended.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?