The one thing that used to pissed me off (still do, but I used to to - RIP Mitch) is the "rare and mild" monikor every time some talking head MD (Medical Democrat) would say about vaccine adverse reaction. Or myocarditis in young men. "yes, but it's rare and mild" Lying 🎒of 💩's What's mild about damaged heart muscle for young men or women? And how would you know given that IT'S IMPOSSIBLE to look into the future - wormholes be damned.
I had a cardiologist 110% dismissive just last week. I sat there and took it (as usual) because there's literally zero else I can do about it. I know what happened to me. 3 years later, my heart wall is starting to stiffen and thicken, and my blood pressure has become difficult to control. It is attributed to "age and lifestyle," as always. My BP before the vaccine was 117/70 in 2021, and I had a clean bill of health from a stress test just a few years before that. I had zero heart problems before vax, but now I'm a "conspiracy theorist" or "anti-vaxxer" (despite having TAKEN the vaccine).
I can tell you what the future holds: Your heart was injured. And you may "get over" short term myocarditis, but I haven't gotten over the hypertension. I've had COVID since getting cleared of myocarditis, but two different strains gave me palpitations, again. I feel like I've gone from a healthy heart to watching years I expected to have in my twilight flying out the window ...
Dr Prasad: Why don't you ask the authors about running the analysis you suggest of risk of myocarditis after COVID, for the population at risk for myocarditis after vaccination? It'll be hard for you to get the data, but the authors should already have it. If this were me, I'd welcome that suggestions.
Still, fascinating -- we all *thought/assumed* that vaccination protected against COVID being serious enough to lead to myocarditis. I know I did. Now I am thinking, why? That was not evidence-based.
Bernie Black (COVID and other stuff researcher at Northwestern)
Dear Vinay, You write "vaccines don’t stop COVID transmission". Actually, has the modified-messenger-RNA (mmRNA) in these vaccines made people more vulnerable to (repeated) Covid infections? The original developers realised that mRNA works as a ligand. The ligand action regulates the immune response. The authors document that mice died when injected with mRNA due to hyper reaction of the immune system. However, they realised that by modifying Uracil through methylation (changing uracil into psi, Ψ, also called pseudo uridine, or N1-methyl-pseudouridine) it down regulates the immune system. They showed that the down regulating effect increases as more as more U in mRNA is methylated. In the vaccines, all (100 %) Uracil in mRNA is modification to m1Ψ. https://www.cell.com/immunity/fulltext/S1074-7613(05)00211-6
Thank you again Vinay, for enlightening us on this new study. Due to data sharing rules ( which really should be called we are not sharing our data!) I don’t know if you’re going to get the answers to your questions?
The one thing that used to pissed me off (still do, but I used to to - RIP Mitch) is the "rare and mild" monikor every time some talking head MD (Medical Democrat) would say about vaccine adverse reaction. Or myocarditis in young men. "yes, but it's rare and mild" Lying 🎒of 💩's What's mild about damaged heart muscle for young men or women? And how would you know given that IT'S IMPOSSIBLE to look into the future - wormholes be damned.
I had a cardiologist 110% dismissive just last week. I sat there and took it (as usual) because there's literally zero else I can do about it. I know what happened to me. 3 years later, my heart wall is starting to stiffen and thicken, and my blood pressure has become difficult to control. It is attributed to "age and lifestyle," as always. My BP before the vaccine was 117/70 in 2021, and I had a clean bill of health from a stress test just a few years before that. I had zero heart problems before vax, but now I'm a "conspiracy theorist" or "anti-vaxxer" (despite having TAKEN the vaccine).
I can tell you what the future holds: Your heart was injured. And you may "get over" short term myocarditis, but I haven't gotten over the hypertension. I've had COVID since getting cleared of myocarditis, but two different strains gave me palpitations, again. I feel like I've gone from a healthy heart to watching years I expected to have in my twilight flying out the window ...
Dr Prasad: Why don't you ask the authors about running the analysis you suggest of risk of myocarditis after COVID, for the population at risk for myocarditis after vaccination? It'll be hard for you to get the data, but the authors should already have it. If this were me, I'd welcome that suggestions.
Still, fascinating -- we all *thought/assumed* that vaccination protected against COVID being serious enough to lead to myocarditis. I know I did. Now I am thinking, why? That was not evidence-based.
Bernie Black (COVID and other stuff researcher at Northwestern)
Dear Vinay, You write "vaccines don’t stop COVID transmission". Actually, has the modified-messenger-RNA (mmRNA) in these vaccines made people more vulnerable to (repeated) Covid infections? The original developers realised that mRNA works as a ligand. The ligand action regulates the immune response. The authors document that mice died when injected with mRNA due to hyper reaction of the immune system. However, they realised that by modifying Uracil through methylation (changing uracil into psi, Ψ, also called pseudo uridine, or N1-methyl-pseudouridine) it down regulates the immune system. They showed that the down regulating effect increases as more as more U in mRNA is methylated. In the vaccines, all (100 %) Uracil in mRNA is modification to m1Ψ. https://www.cell.com/immunity/fulltext/S1074-7613(05)00211-6
If you really want to dive into the molecular biology of the mRNA, this podcast with Dr. Martin Zizi is great.
The Illusion of Consensus: mRNA’s Breakthrough in Modern Medicine with Martin Zizi
Episode webpage: https://www.illusionconsensus.com/podcast
Media file: https://afp-127205-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/85c1a76b-10ca-4e8e-b583-6a9406d59fdb/episodes/14cbedf5-5e94-480e-a524-a8d14abc57dc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&awCollectionId=85c1a76b-10ca-4e8e-b583-6a9406d59fdb&awEpisodeId=14cbedf5-5e94-480e-a524-a8d14abc57dc&feed=yOi8KRfC
This link summarizes some of the points:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/bradbankomd_the-illusion-of-consensus-rav-arora-substack-activity-7223296554223218688-yStd?utm_source=combined_share_message&utm_medium=member_android
Would like to read/watch Vinay discuss this.
Thank you again Vinay, for enlightening us on this new study. Due to data sharing rules ( which really should be called we are not sharing our data!) I don’t know if you’re going to get the answers to your questions?
This reads like a premature effort to make news. I wish you had waited until you had actual numbers instead of "guesstimates."
Did you read the data “sharing “ rules? He may not ever get it….
In your opinion, how large does the denominator have to be for this to not be "news?"
That is an excellent question.