I haven’t taken one yet, I don’t see any use in starting now. The only way I would ever take one is if it would be used to determine what kind of early treatments I would receive, but even then I don’t see the need since one could prescribe ivermectin for a broad range of ailments. Unfortunately, most docs still won’t touch ivermectin thanks to all the politics and misinformation, and even if they do the pharmacists decided to act as gatekeepers again, so what’s the point of taking their stupid tests? To me, if anyone is still taking covid tests, and if they’re still wearing masks, there’s zero hope for them.
Li et al. (2007a) compared the pulmonary response of mice exposed to purified MWCNT by IT instillation versus inhalation.
Intratracheal instillation produced inflammation and severe destruction of alveolar structures, while inhalation predominately resulted in moderate pathology consisting of alveolar wall thickening and cell proliferation but general alveolar structure was retained. This study demonstrated significant differences in the type and degree of pulmonary responses to MWCNT in mice between bolus-type IT instillation and inhalation, with higher doses deposited in lung by inhalation resulting in only moderate effects compared to severe lesions induced by instillation of lower doses. (!!!!!)
“A recent study of particular objects known as "nanotubes," revered for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity, demonstrated that such objects tend to clump within the lungs, causing suffocation.”
“Take the experience of researchers at DuPont, who are testing microscopic tubes of carbon, known as nanotubes, valued for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity.
When the researchers injected nanotubes into the lungs of rats in the summer of 2002, the animals unexpectedly began gasping for breath. Fifteen percent of them quickly died. ''It was the highest death rate we had ever seen,''
said David B. Warheit, the research leader, who began his career studying asbestos and has been testing the pulmonary effects of various chemicals for DuPont since 1984.
Early research has raised troubling issues. DuPont and others, for example, found evidence that the cells that break down foreign particles in rodent lungs have more trouble detecting and handling nanoparticles than larger particles that have long been studied by air pollution experts.
Lungs are not the only concern.
Research shows that nanoparticles deposited in the nose can make their way directly into the brain.
They can also change shape as they move from liquid solutions to the air, making it harder to draw general conclusions about their potential impact on living things. “
The best thing to come out of all of this is that people finally decided to stay home when sick in general. 7-8 years ago I had a coworker stroll into the office and tell us she’d thrown up multiple times that morning and “felt like crap”. My other coworker at the time came with pink eye and we all avoided her like the plague. One girl who reported to me came to work very obviously feverish and miserable and I sent her home immediately (she had the flu). Now? Just an excuse to work from home, it’s rare to see anyone sick at work.
Sadly this trend is over. Thanks in part to public “health” telling everyone that masks are magic. Now every day I get sick people coming in to my dental office. They think that hiding their smile makes it all okay. And we’ve been very clear that we’re doing elective procedures; if you are sick just call and reschedule. No penalty. They’ve been convinced that they don’t need to, courtesy of our tax dollars.
Yeah that is true too. Though I do feel that anyone wearing a mask is immediately looked at suspiciously if they aren’t a consistent mask wearer (obviously they’re sick, not trying to avoid sickness) (maybe because I’m in a red state). I had a major surgery done when I had a minor cold (dr knew, said it was fine since it was only a head cold) it made recovery worse and I didn’t particularly enjoy it. I don’t understand how people don’t want to reschedule an elective one for when they’re better, just a better option all around!
You are bang on. I'm a Paramedic that covers a one of the busiest airports in North America. Just this past week I was called for a 23 y/o female returning form a southern tropical vacation. While there she fell ill with fever, cough, aches and pains. The day before they departed (4 days since onset of symptoms) she went to a local physician who administered a 'rapid covid test' of which came back negative. She was treated with steroids and inhalers and told to 'not say anything and fly home tomorrow and go to the hospital when you return' (oh ya, he told her she may also have a partial collapsed lung but we won't even go there) So she and her husband boarded a multi hour flight in no better a condition than when she saw the physician. When she arrived at our airport we were called. We found her sitting in a wheel chair without a mask. I asked the obvious question "why did you get on an airplane when you were so sick, coughing with wheezing and congestion, and since you did, did you by chance at least wear a mask?' And I bet you can guess, her response was 'no because I tested negative for Covid'. This is only one example of the many people we are called to assist in public places with respiratory flu like symptoms who when we ask why did you go out, they said "because I took the test and it was negative' . This is observational only, but pretty much n line with your video. All the best in 2024.
Begging again. It would not be much work to run these podcasts through an autotranscriber (they are cheap/free) so those of us that must use eyes can get the wisdom as well. Many other sites do and it is always most appreciated. Many thanks.
Agree. That is how we treat the flu and other diseases. However, your Institution UCSF, will disagreee and are about to re-institute masking again. The bottom line is this. None of this is really good science or good medicine. How did we treat epidemics or pandemics in the past? The various flu epidemics in the past? We treated this sensibly. If sick, stay home. Virtually everyone I see with Covid, has been multiply vaccinated -- recently.
Don’t you find it interesting that in the 12th century science was corrupted by religion and now it is corrupted by politics. The former born of ignorance and the latter by greed!
This is excellent! I've worked in and around medicine for over 40 years. Our medical community has been deceived brought into the woke through our depraved educational system run and managed by depraved people and that is why we have what we have. Just think, many hospitals are bringing back masking and I ask for what purpose! Thank you for your common logical sense and showing the truth. I agree, sooner or later the truth will come out and people will have to acknowledge that the emperor has no cloths! I hope and pray that it will come sooner than later and that there will be consequences for those who have propigated this wicked madness!
No freaking way. The is NO standardized test for covid. PCR is a ruse and most home kits are made in China. If you trust that, you are moving closer to your demise.
As always Vinay is spot on and presents the common sense approach. Of course if one feels ill stay at home. That's all that ever needed doing during the entire covid episode. There is no point in testing for any ILI (including Covid and influenza) unless it is going to affect treatment. Some may say "but in covid with have paxlovid." But paxlovid is next to useless for anybody who has had covid prior, who has been vaccinated and is not at high risk. Perhaps the better approach for any viral ILI is to watch carefully for the presence of secondary bacterial pneumonia, the real killer, and treat accordingly with antibiotics.
Is it my understanding that you can spread C19 without being symptomatic? I always thought you had to be symptomatic to spread the cold, flu etc - is C19 that different? Please explain thanks. Being subjected to problematic testing regimes and PCR's also muddies the water!
JAMA published a few meta analyses and showed asymptomatic spread is really rare. But then the CDC published a “study” showing 50% of spread was from asymptomatic patients. Their study, though, was just a computer model that assumed asymptomatic patients were nearly as contagious as symptomatic. Which is a comically bad way to design a “study” -- to just declare your desired outcome and then show that if you assume their desired outcome, then their desired outcome is true.
Exactly. The truth, of course, is that SARS-CoV2 is not going to behave any differently from any other coronavirus or the innumerable other viruses that cause ILIs. To spread the virus one needs to have a high viral load and that automatically means that one is going to be symptomatic. Now is it possible, on some very rare occasion, that somebody with a low viral load who has minimal symptoms (e.g. pre-symptomatic) could infect somebody else; sure but this will be rare as shown in the JAMA meta analyses.
Great video, thank you for addressing the elephant in the room - so sick of the people who believe covid is the only illness that threatens vulnerable people thinking they can just go about their daily lives if they're sick as long as it's "not covid". If someone is sick, they should stay home. Anyone who actually has a vulnerable family member understands this intimately and understood it before covid as well.
I'd love to see you try and distinguish for people the difference between testing positive for sars-cov-2 versus actually having covid. The population at large doesn't seem to understand that covid is the actual disease and not everyone who has the virus will actually develop the disease.
2 years ago, we were asked to mask and celebrate christmas outside with family when NO ONE HAD SYMPTOMS (because my husband and I were not vaccinated), to protect a 3 year old, NOT to protect my 93 yo mother, or their parents and family in 60s.
This year, we were perceived as unreasonable for requesting that same family with a child who had given a stomach virus to her dad a day earlier not come over. They came over and subsequently 9 people have gotten the virus, including me. Fortunately, my 95 yo mother was not one of them! They are mystified as to the source ("too many variables"). Needless to say, they all still test for covid and have had it multiple times. Is it poetic justice that the mother of the 5yo, so cavalier about exposing her daughter to seniors multiple times came down with the virus herself and said it's the sickest she's been in a long time--sicker than with covid all 3 times!!
I haven’t taken one yet, I don’t see any use in starting now. The only way I would ever take one is if it would be used to determine what kind of early treatments I would receive, but even then I don’t see the need since one could prescribe ivermectin for a broad range of ailments. Unfortunately, most docs still won’t touch ivermectin thanks to all the politics and misinformation, and even if they do the pharmacists decided to act as gatekeepers again, so what’s the point of taking their stupid tests? To me, if anyone is still taking covid tests, and if they’re still wearing masks, there’s zero hope for them.
Good for you, it is EXTREMELY TOXIC and a piece of garbage
https://outraged.substack.com/p/thats-what-covid-is
Li et al. (2007a) compared the pulmonary response of mice exposed to purified MWCNT by IT instillation versus inhalation.
Intratracheal instillation produced inflammation and severe destruction of alveolar structures, while inhalation predominately resulted in moderate pathology consisting of alveolar wall thickening and cell proliferation but general alveolar structure was retained. This study demonstrated significant differences in the type and degree of pulmonary responses to MWCNT in mice between bolus-type IT instillation and inhalation, with higher doses deposited in lung by inhalation resulting in only moderate effects compared to severe lesions induced by instillation of lower doses. (!!!!!)
“A recent study of particular objects known as "nanotubes," revered for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity, demonstrated that such objects tend to clump within the lungs, causing suffocation.”
https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1119251 Is Nanotechnology Prohibited by the Biological and Chemical Weapons Conventions
“Take the experience of researchers at DuPont, who are testing microscopic tubes of carbon, known as nanotubes, valued for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity.
When the researchers injected nanotubes into the lungs of rats in the summer of 2002, the animals unexpectedly began gasping for breath. Fifteen percent of them quickly died. ''It was the highest death rate we had ever seen,''
said David B. Warheit, the research leader, who began his career studying asbestos and has been testing the pulmonary effects of various chemicals for DuPont since 1984.
Early research has raised troubling issues. DuPont and others, for example, found evidence that the cells that break down foreign particles in rodent lungs have more trouble detecting and handling nanoparticles than larger particles that have long been studied by air pollution experts.
Lungs are not the only concern.
Research shows that nanoparticles deposited in the nose can make their way directly into the brain.
They can also change shape as they move from liquid solutions to the air, making it harder to draw general conclusions about their potential impact on living things. “
https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=37676 Using a Graphene-Based Electrochemical Sensor to Detect COVID-19 in Under Five Minutes (azonano.com)
https://www.biospace.com/article/new-graphene-chemo-phononic-test-for-sars-cov-2-may-challenge-pcr-assays/
https://www.nsmedicaldevices.com/news/graphene-sensor-covid-19-test/
https://outraged.substack.com/p/bill-gates-is-a-pcr-test-fortune
https://rumble.com/vo8v3f-nasal-swabs-for-pcr-tests-are-higly-dangerous-.html
No do not comply, period
Nothing is gained for you or us.
That's what I've said for years; figure out how to encourage people to stay home when they're sick...
Especially, when coughing and sneezing. Also, provide incentives and education for effective self-care and enhancing our own immune system.
The best thing to come out of all of this is that people finally decided to stay home when sick in general. 7-8 years ago I had a coworker stroll into the office and tell us she’d thrown up multiple times that morning and “felt like crap”. My other coworker at the time came with pink eye and we all avoided her like the plague. One girl who reported to me came to work very obviously feverish and miserable and I sent her home immediately (she had the flu). Now? Just an excuse to work from home, it’s rare to see anyone sick at work.
Sadly this trend is over. Thanks in part to public “health” telling everyone that masks are magic. Now every day I get sick people coming in to my dental office. They think that hiding their smile makes it all okay. And we’ve been very clear that we’re doing elective procedures; if you are sick just call and reschedule. No penalty. They’ve been convinced that they don’t need to, courtesy of our tax dollars.
Yeah that is true too. Though I do feel that anyone wearing a mask is immediately looked at suspiciously if they aren’t a consistent mask wearer (obviously they’re sick, not trying to avoid sickness) (maybe because I’m in a red state). I had a major surgery done when I had a minor cold (dr knew, said it was fine since it was only a head cold) it made recovery worse and I didn’t particularly enjoy it. I don’t understand how people don’t want to reschedule an elective one for when they’re better, just a better option all around!
You are bang on. I'm a Paramedic that covers a one of the busiest airports in North America. Just this past week I was called for a 23 y/o female returning form a southern tropical vacation. While there she fell ill with fever, cough, aches and pains. The day before they departed (4 days since onset of symptoms) she went to a local physician who administered a 'rapid covid test' of which came back negative. She was treated with steroids and inhalers and told to 'not say anything and fly home tomorrow and go to the hospital when you return' (oh ya, he told her she may also have a partial collapsed lung but we won't even go there) So she and her husband boarded a multi hour flight in no better a condition than when she saw the physician. When she arrived at our airport we were called. We found her sitting in a wheel chair without a mask. I asked the obvious question "why did you get on an airplane when you were so sick, coughing with wheezing and congestion, and since you did, did you by chance at least wear a mask?' And I bet you can guess, her response was 'no because I tested negative for Covid'. This is only one example of the many people we are called to assist in public places with respiratory flu like symptoms who when we ask why did you go out, they said "because I took the test and it was negative' . This is observational only, but pretty much n line with your video. All the best in 2024.
Thank you V❤️
Begging again. It would not be much work to run these podcasts through an autotranscriber (they are cheap/free) so those of us that must use eyes can get the wisdom as well. Many other sites do and it is always most appreciated. Many thanks.
Dr. K, this, like many of Dr. Prasad's posts, are available in many platforms. Turning on Youtube's Close Captioning achieves your desired result.
Agree. That is how we treat the flu and other diseases. However, your Institution UCSF, will disagreee and are about to re-institute masking again. The bottom line is this. None of this is really good science or good medicine. How did we treat epidemics or pandemics in the past? The various flu epidemics in the past? We treated this sensibly. If sick, stay home. Virtually everyone I see with Covid, has been multiply vaccinated -- recently.
Excellent, Vinay! Thank you!!
Don’t you find it interesting that in the 12th century science was corrupted by religion and now it is corrupted by politics. The former born of ignorance and the latter by greed!
This is excellent! I've worked in and around medicine for over 40 years. Our medical community has been deceived brought into the woke through our depraved educational system run and managed by depraved people and that is why we have what we have. Just think, many hospitals are bringing back masking and I ask for what purpose! Thank you for your common logical sense and showing the truth. I agree, sooner or later the truth will come out and people will have to acknowledge that the emperor has no cloths! I hope and pray that it will come sooner than later and that there will be consequences for those who have propigated this wicked madness!
Amen.
Try hcc c
No do not comply
No freaking way. The is NO standardized test for covid. PCR is a ruse and most home kits are made in China. If you trust that, you are moving closer to your demise.
As always Vinay is spot on and presents the common sense approach. Of course if one feels ill stay at home. That's all that ever needed doing during the entire covid episode. There is no point in testing for any ILI (including Covid and influenza) unless it is going to affect treatment. Some may say "but in covid with have paxlovid." But paxlovid is next to useless for anybody who has had covid prior, who has been vaccinated and is not at high risk. Perhaps the better approach for any viral ILI is to watch carefully for the presence of secondary bacterial pneumonia, the real killer, and treat accordingly with antibiotics.
Is it my understanding that you can spread C19 without being symptomatic? I always thought you had to be symptomatic to spread the cold, flu etc - is C19 that different? Please explain thanks. Being subjected to problematic testing regimes and PCR's also muddies the water!
JAMA published a few meta analyses and showed asymptomatic spread is really rare. But then the CDC published a “study” showing 50% of spread was from asymptomatic patients. Their study, though, was just a computer model that assumed asymptomatic patients were nearly as contagious as symptomatic. Which is a comically bad way to design a “study” -- to just declare your desired outcome and then show that if you assume their desired outcome, then their desired outcome is true.
Exactly. The truth, of course, is that SARS-CoV2 is not going to behave any differently from any other coronavirus or the innumerable other viruses that cause ILIs. To spread the virus one needs to have a high viral load and that automatically means that one is going to be symptomatic. Now is it possible, on some very rare occasion, that somebody with a low viral load who has minimal symptoms (e.g. pre-symptomatic) could infect somebody else; sure but this will be rare as shown in the JAMA meta analyses.
Great video, thank you for addressing the elephant in the room - so sick of the people who believe covid is the only illness that threatens vulnerable people thinking they can just go about their daily lives if they're sick as long as it's "not covid". If someone is sick, they should stay home. Anyone who actually has a vulnerable family member understands this intimately and understood it before covid as well.
I'd love to see you try and distinguish for people the difference between testing positive for sars-cov-2 versus actually having covid. The population at large doesn't seem to understand that covid is the actual disease and not everyone who has the virus will actually develop the disease.
2 years ago, we were asked to mask and celebrate christmas outside with family when NO ONE HAD SYMPTOMS (because my husband and I were not vaccinated), to protect a 3 year old, NOT to protect my 93 yo mother, or their parents and family in 60s.
This year, we were perceived as unreasonable for requesting that same family with a child who had given a stomach virus to her dad a day earlier not come over. They came over and subsequently 9 people have gotten the virus, including me. Fortunately, my 95 yo mother was not one of them! They are mystified as to the source ("too many variables"). Needless to say, they all still test for covid and have had it multiple times. Is it poetic justice that the mother of the 5yo, so cavalier about exposing her daughter to seniors multiple times came down with the virus herself and said it's the sickest she's been in a long time--sicker than with covid all 3 times!!