I have been a fan of your writing since the beginning of Covid. I am glad to see you back, and very angry at how you were treated by the media and others this past year. I canceled my WSJ subscription that I've had for years. That newspaper's scathing hysterical commentary on your work at the CDC helped me to make that decision. Thank you for the Longevity Science!!
God bless you, doc! And thank you for coming back with your head high, you are a true hero to so many.
Regarding longevity research in general, I read recently that much of the research is now considered highly suspect because turns out the very old people in many areas were not actually alive and it is just welfare fraud. Like all the 110 year olds DOGE uncovered still cashing social security. Is this ever addressed in the academic research?
I have been a fan of your writing since the beginning of Covid. I am glad to see you back, and very angry at how you were treated by the media and others this past year. I canceled my WSJ subscription that I've had for years. That newspaper's scathing hysterical commentary on your work at the CDC helped me to make that decision. Thank you for the Longevity Science!!
Welcome back! You were missed!
Welcome back! I missed you!
Pox on the Wall Street Journal and their Pharma funded vendetta against you.
Ok this series will be great. But come on spill the beans…!
You’re back! Im tearing up. ❤️
God bless you, doc! And thank you for coming back with your head high, you are a true hero to so many.
Regarding longevity research in general, I read recently that much of the research is now considered highly suspect because turns out the very old people in many areas were not actually alive and it is just welfare fraud. Like all the 110 year olds DOGE uncovered still cashing social security. Is this ever addressed in the academic research?
Neutrally yes.
Neuter-ally, well yes also, selectively.
Look forward to your series.