The media bias in reporting here from NYT is laughable.
I am staunchly opposed to Trump, but couldn’t be more happy with this pick. It also makes me feel more secure in the sense that he should serve to balance RFKs misguided notions re: drugs, vaccines, etc.
The media bias in reporting here from NYT is laughable.
I am staunchly opposed to Trump, but couldn’t be more happy with this pick. It also makes me feel more secure in the sense that he should serve to balance RFKs misguided notions re: drugs, vaccines, etc.
You think the wanting to address the absence of active surveillance of vaccines injuries and the absence of placebo controlled safety studies is miguided? Why would you want a child to receive dozens of injections without any postmarketing safety data? The 2013 iom report acknowledged this lack of safety data of the entire immunization schedule and they have yet to do the studies. A CDC study from last year or 2022 found a dose response relationship between aluminum adjuvant and asthma— shouldn’t we participate in the decision making process and be informed that a risk of asthma is associated with the aluminum dosage in vaccines?
That was a weird tangent. No, I would say his insistence that vaccines cause autism, or any one of his series of other completely wacky/unsubstantiated ideas. He also often simply lies when referencing papers, etc.
The question whether “vaccines cause autism” is yet to be answered because the studies available only look at one vaccine: mmr, or one ingredient: thimerosal, or cumulative antigens (with lowest exposure being about 12 vaccines) and none of the prior mentioned studies include completely unvaccinated, zero exposed children. So functionally, every child was vaccinated and these are vaccinated vs vaccinated studies. How on earth could that answer the question if every child has vaccines in the study?
The title of that paper is: “ Measles, Mumps, Rubella Vaccination and Autism: A Nationwide Cohort Study” which is literally one vaccine that children get between the ages of 12-18 months, after they’ve already received 3 dtap, 3 hep b, 3 hib, 3 polio, 2 or 3 rotavirus, 3 pneumococcal, a hep a, and possibly a varicella, 2 flu shots etc. The question whether mmr vaccine causes autism could be answered, but not all vaccines, or “vaccination” itself.
The study adjusted for other childhood vaccines, and is one of many other varied analyses that reach the same conclusion. You are clinging on to an assumptive conclusion, unsubstantiated by any meaningful evidence (or even a well developed theory), with such a tight grip that you will never let go of it, no matter the preponderance of evidence to the contrary
The hvid paper didn’t measure the effects of vaccination, only mmr vaccine. And the rate of autism in that paper is also way lower than US. How did they miss so many cases of autism?
The media bias in reporting here from NYT is laughable.
I am staunchly opposed to Trump, but couldn’t be more happy with this pick. It also makes me feel more secure in the sense that he should serve to balance RFKs misguided notions re: drugs, vaccines, etc.
You think the wanting to address the absence of active surveillance of vaccines injuries and the absence of placebo controlled safety studies is miguided? Why would you want a child to receive dozens of injections without any postmarketing safety data? The 2013 iom report acknowledged this lack of safety data of the entire immunization schedule and they have yet to do the studies. A CDC study from last year or 2022 found a dose response relationship between aluminum adjuvant and asthma— shouldn’t we participate in the decision making process and be informed that a risk of asthma is associated with the aluminum dosage in vaccines?
That was a weird tangent. No, I would say his insistence that vaccines cause autism, or any one of his series of other completely wacky/unsubstantiated ideas. He also often simply lies when referencing papers, etc.
The question whether “vaccines cause autism” is yet to be answered because the studies available only look at one vaccine: mmr, or one ingredient: thimerosal, or cumulative antigens (with lowest exposure being about 12 vaccines) and none of the prior mentioned studies include completely unvaccinated, zero exposed children. So functionally, every child was vaccinated and these are vaccinated vs vaccinated studies. How on earth could that answer the question if every child has vaccines in the study?
You’re literally making this up
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M18-2101
Just one of several massive cohort studies….all quality trials produce the same results….the question is absolutely answered
The title of that paper is: “ Measles, Mumps, Rubella Vaccination and Autism: A Nationwide Cohort Study” which is literally one vaccine that children get between the ages of 12-18 months, after they’ve already received 3 dtap, 3 hep b, 3 hib, 3 polio, 2 or 3 rotavirus, 3 pneumococcal, a hep a, and possibly a varicella, 2 flu shots etc. The question whether mmr vaccine causes autism could be answered, but not all vaccines, or “vaccination” itself.
The study adjusted for other childhood vaccines, and is one of many other varied analyses that reach the same conclusion. You are clinging on to an assumptive conclusion, unsubstantiated by any meaningful evidence (or even a well developed theory), with such a tight grip that you will never let go of it, no matter the preponderance of evidence to the contrary
The hvid paper didn’t measure the effects of vaccination, only mmr vaccine. And the rate of autism in that paper is also way lower than US. How did they miss so many cases of autism?