20 Comments
User's avatar
Adrian Gaty's avatar

Meanwhile, latest JAMA has

- a study showing vaccines double apneic events in preemies

- a study showing a link between fluoride and IQ drop

Do either of these get published if Kamala wins the election?

Expand full comment
Guttermouth's avatar

I'm not $ure. I a$$ume there'$ a logical rea$on, but I'm ju$t a $illy civilian out$ide of the medical community.

Expand full comment
Frederic whinery's avatar

Hi Guttermouth

Did you take some lessons from Dr Fauci’s FOIA avoidance expert?

Expand full comment
Guttermouth's avatar

I don't recall.

Expand full comment
Paul Laband MD's avatar

It kill’s me that so many people cannot tell when you are making a joke. Most of your jokes make me chuckle. Also, I think there is a typo…I assume you meant to say that Anthony Bourdain (love that guy, tragic loss) is NOT and idiot like the guy who said seed oils are safer. Also, I love cooking with tallow. So much better. Thanks for all your great writing.

Expand full comment
Paul Laband MD's avatar

…and I made a typo when I was pointing out the typo 😂🤦‍♂️

Expand full comment
Elizabeth's avatar

I noticed that too 😊

Expand full comment
KPL's avatar

Yes!!! Fries in tallow!

Expand full comment
Jay See's avatar

Unfortunately, for McDonald's at least, when they were "cooking fries in tallow", it was actually in a mix of tallow (93%) and soybean oil (7%) called Formula 47. lol

Expand full comment
KaiKai's avatar

The safety of red dye has been questioned for years. Why now? What is different?

Expand full comment
Tnk's avatar

I always get your humor! Keep it coming :) here’s the truth, I don’t trust any “study” anymore. I wait to see what Sensible Medicine has to offer first.

Expand full comment
Bill T55's avatar

Confused, are you saying Red Food coloring isn’t harmful enough to ban? You don’t need a RCT to know it negatively affects kids. Just watch them squirm and become unmanageable when they consume that chemical.

In fact all food/body additives should be tested for toxicity and negative effects BEFORE they are allowed to be used in products. These products are toxic and addictive (on purpose). They should not be allowed. Period.

Expand full comment
Jan Hollerbach's avatar

Love the combination of science and snark. Keep it coming!

Expand full comment
Rebecca Dieter's avatar

Awesome! LoL

Expand full comment
TM's avatar

I love your jokes and sharp wit lol

Expand full comment
Joseph's avatar

Awesome commentary! Thanks.

Expand full comment
J Lee MD PhD's avatar

bravo

Expand full comment
Stephen Brackett's avatar

Because safer readily available alternatives to red#3 exist?

Expand full comment
Vichammer1985's avatar

I hope when I visit my nephew at USC, i might get to attend one of your lectures/presentations. I love your YouTube and Substack topics. Keep this going, Vinay. It's so assuring hearing other colleagues with data supported views.

Expand full comment
Schmidt Happens's avatar

It was mentioned that Red #3 is already banned in Europe but it's not. It just goes by E127 there.

Is there better evidence that whatever gets substituted for Red #3 will be safer?

Expand full comment