Are you aware of the putative physical chemistry laws, postulated, but not yet known or understood clearly, by current scientists, that undergird as logical predicate the physiological effects Hanneman ushered into medicine with his discovery of homeopathy?
Feel the unity of science, sister. It's there to both apprehend and own.
Are you aware of the putative physical chemistry laws, postulated, but not yet known or understood clearly, by current scientists, that undergird as logical predicate the physiological effects Hanneman ushered into medicine with his discovery of homeopathy?
Feel the unity of science, sister. It's there to both apprehend and own.
There are no putative laws which explain homeopathy. Homeopathy was once beneficial because it was safer than quack cures. If you read up the basis of homeopathy it was never based on science. Hahnemann was no scientist and there is agreement that homeopathy is unscientific. If you were to read a proving they are obviously utter garbage based on personal dreams and emotions..
Even if it were to work via some mysterious processes which contradict our current understanding, there are no good RCTs which show that homeopathy works. Evidence based science requires no understanding of the underlying mechanism.
And are you seriously proposing that at a time we can find neutrinos that there are mysterious mythical forces? We should rather believe some people with vested interests in homeopathy with what hand waving they come up with? Science is not speculation. Until they present hard data it is not science.
Thinking like yours would believe that if the best science was used to invent and ultimate bring to market a wonder drug, all of the drug's safety and efficacy would be attributable to it and it alone and not possibly in any part or measure the constant potential for the placebo effect.
Did you, and until when if you no longer, or do you continue to find the COVID "vaccine" safe and effective -- but if not, certainly unrelated in any way to the millions killed or maimed since the availability of the "vaccine" (read accurately: the wickedly criminal deployment of a bioweapon)'s multiple means of the sure and eventual biodestruction of its host-target). After all, it's a product of science, and there is little to no evidence of corruption in science. Its methods and programs are completely reliable and trustworthy.
(Real world -- what's that, and who cares, anyway? your manner appears to scream. I believe, deep-down, it's actually a sad and lonely cry you wish you could feel but can't. Yet. So, get help. Do it for yourself, if now for nobody else.)
In the real world there are no wonder drugs. If it has a beneficial effect it is bound to also have unwanted effects. The aim is to find a substance where the benefit clearly exceeds the cost.
Using real world common sense, covid vaccines are a lot more beneficial than not. And they always and for everybody beneficial. No, of course not, but they have been proven to be a lot safer than the virus. A virus which boast zero safety and efficacy testing.
The only objections to covid vaccines are ideological. Apparently this here is a nice ideological bubble and you resent people who do not share your ideology. This does not jibe with your call for unity. Or do you mean there is only unity when everybody else finally shares your opinion?
Wow -- on a whim, a totally different persona: now, the reasonable, ad hominem-eschewing, nuts and bolts-arguing, true debater.
Or, the AI-regulated effect of an increasingly likely, updated set of column author-programmed parameters, fed into ChatGPT to modify the planted bot's demeanor, but still the intellectual foil, at the ready.
In other words, just part of the fuller experience we can anticipate in this, another deceptive, manipulatory aspect of our New Bizarro World of Medicine.
Are you aware of the putative physical chemistry laws, postulated, but not yet known or understood clearly, by current scientists, that undergird as logical predicate the physiological effects Hanneman ushered into medicine with his discovery of homeopathy?
Feel the unity of science, sister. It's there to both apprehend and own.
There are no putative laws which explain homeopathy. Homeopathy was once beneficial because it was safer than quack cures. If you read up the basis of homeopathy it was never based on science. Hahnemann was no scientist and there is agreement that homeopathy is unscientific. If you were to read a proving they are obviously utter garbage based on personal dreams and emotions..
Even if it were to work via some mysterious processes which contradict our current understanding, there are no good RCTs which show that homeopathy works. Evidence based science requires no understanding of the underlying mechanism.
And are you seriously proposing that at a time we can find neutrinos that there are mysterious mythical forces? We should rather believe some people with vested interests in homeopathy with what hand waving they come up with? Science is not speculation. Until they present hard data it is not science.
Thinking like yours would believe that if the best science was used to invent and ultimate bring to market a wonder drug, all of the drug's safety and efficacy would be attributable to it and it alone and not possibly in any part or measure the constant potential for the placebo effect.
Did you, and until when if you no longer, or do you continue to find the COVID "vaccine" safe and effective -- but if not, certainly unrelated in any way to the millions killed or maimed since the availability of the "vaccine" (read accurately: the wickedly criminal deployment of a bioweapon)'s multiple means of the sure and eventual biodestruction of its host-target). After all, it's a product of science, and there is little to no evidence of corruption in science. Its methods and programs are completely reliable and trustworthy.
(Real world -- what's that, and who cares, anyway? your manner appears to scream. I believe, deep-down, it's actually a sad and lonely cry you wish you could feel but can't. Yet. So, get help. Do it for yourself, if now for nobody else.)
In the real world there are no wonder drugs. If it has a beneficial effect it is bound to also have unwanted effects. The aim is to find a substance where the benefit clearly exceeds the cost.
Using real world common sense, covid vaccines are a lot more beneficial than not. And they always and for everybody beneficial. No, of course not, but they have been proven to be a lot safer than the virus. A virus which boast zero safety and efficacy testing.
The only objections to covid vaccines are ideological. Apparently this here is a nice ideological bubble and you resent people who do not share your ideology. This does not jibe with your call for unity. Or do you mean there is only unity when everybody else finally shares your opinion?
Wow -- on a whim, a totally different persona: now, the reasonable, ad hominem-eschewing, nuts and bolts-arguing, true debater.
Or, the AI-regulated effect of an increasingly likely, updated set of column author-programmed parameters, fed into ChatGPT to modify the planted bot's demeanor, but still the intellectual foil, at the ready.
In other words, just part of the fuller experience we can anticipate in this, another deceptive, manipulatory aspect of our New Bizarro World of Medicine.
Give it a try. Keeping the moral high ground is always an advantage, besides it might set a good example to people not so inclined.
Besides once you start bringing in tone policing and insults, you conceded that you can't win a debate on substance.