Not sure what meaning I can apply to such a silly recommendation. Given the potential hazards of additional mRNA, I refused the booster; I most certainly think it unwise. At 82 I prefer to try avoiding the illness by other means. I feel worried over the silly 50 year old who thinks they are reducing the risk of infection via a transit…
Not sure what meaning I can apply to such a silly recommendation. Given the potential hazards of additional mRNA, I refused the booster; I most certainly think it unwise. At 82 I prefer to try avoiding the illness by other means. I feel worried over the silly 50 year old who thinks they are reducing the risk of infection via a transitory leaky vaccine in exchange for a potential risk of vaccine harm. Hazards may be cumulative and we lack those data.
Not sure what meaning I can apply to such a silly recommendation. Given the potential hazards of additional mRNA, I refused the booster; I most certainly think it unwise. At 82 I prefer to try avoiding the illness by other means. I feel worried over the silly 50 year old who thinks they are reducing the risk of infection via a transitory leaky vaccine in exchange for a potential risk of vaccine harm. Hazards may be cumulative and we lack those data.