Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts

Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts

Share this post

Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts
Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts
Walensky wins the IDSAs Fauci Award
User's avatar
Discover more from Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts
Dr Prasad currently works at the US FDA. The writings on this platform were posted before my FDA employment and do not necessarily represent the views of the FDA or the United States. This site will be inactive during my federal service.
Over 54,000 subscribers
Already have an account? Sign in

Walensky wins the IDSAs Fauci Award

Until public health is honest, no one will trust it.

Vinay Prasad's avatar
Vinay Prasad
Oct 24, 2024
370

Share this post

Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts
Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts
Walensky wins the IDSAs Fauci Award
38
19
Share

If public health wants to regain trust, it has to take an honest assessment of what it got right and got wrong. It can’t celebrate errors. Sadly, it appears that public health is not interested in that task. Take a look.

Walensky wins the Fauci award?! Wow. Here is just a short list of what each of them got wrong

Walensky:

When she was in Brookline, she advocated for school reopening, but when appointed by President Biden, who campaigned on the idea that schools were dangerous, she reversed that stance.

She met privately and discussed CDC guidance with the teachers unions.

She was dishonest about myocarditis. There is no way this was true by the end of April 2021.

The Israelis reported a rate of 1 in 3000 by February, and the EMA would soon confirm the safety signal.

Once she accepted myocarditis exists, she made no effort to lower it. No trials of spaced doses, lower or omitted doses.

She lied constantly about the evidence for masking. She lied to congress stating there was not equipoise for a trial testing if masking worked in children. This was clearly false given that the European CDC and CDC had divergent recommendations— and member states had a range of policies (e.g. Sweden never masked <12, US masked 2+). A divergence of practice is the definition of equipoise.

Walensky supported vaccine mandates, which were unethical, as COVID vaccines had never established a third party benefit.

Walensky pushed vaccines in people who had COVID— a strategy that may even be harmful.

Walensky pushed boosters in low risk populations, a decision that led to the resignation of Gruber/ Krause at FDA.

Walensky’s communication on TV was a constant mess of flip flopping and insecurity; she was a notoriously bad communicator. She even hired an outside consulting firm to help her communications, using taxpayer money.

What did she get right? I am actually not sure. I suppose she was correct that COVID is caused by a virus and that many vitamins don’t work— facts that a high schooler would know— so she got the bare minimum right. But on any policy decisions, particularly those that used the force of the state, she got it wrong.

She famously refused to throw away 6ft of social distancing (a distance pulled from someone’s ass), when when we begged her to do so, as it was stopping school reopening. More on what she got wrong here.

And she gets the Fauci award.

What did Fauci get wrong?

Fauci was of course initially told the truth that multiple RCTs of community masking showed it didn’t help, then he lied about it. He never opposed masking 2 year olds.

He exaggerated the risk to kids. He opposed DeSantis in spring 2020 when DeSantis wanted to reopen schools.

Fauci was wrong about giving 2 doses to fewer people over 1 dose to more people.

Fauci was wrong to not meet with and discuss different ideas with the authors of Great Barrington Declaration.

Fauci was wrong about double masking.

Fauci was wrong about vaccine mandates and ignoring natural immunity.

Fauci was wrong about boosters for young people, vaccines for people who already had COVID.

Most notably, Fauci appears to have used Gmail to evade federal FOIA laws to conceal NIAID’s role in funding the laboratory in Wuhan to conduct gain of function research in sars-coronaviruses.

Public health has a choice. It could actually aspire to have dialog and discussion and pursue the truth, or it could keep promoting the people who were wrong. If it continues to do the latter, I suspect trust will continue to fall.

If I were giving out awards, I would give Rochelle Wallensky the Fauci award for clever and effective propaganda at a time of crisis that polarized a nation and undermined faith in science.


Subscribe to Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts

Thousands of paid subscribers
Dr Prasad currently works at the US FDA. The writings on this platform were posted before my FDA employment and do not necessarily represent the views of the FDA or the United States. This site will be inactive during my federal service.
Toni Muller's avatar
Eric's avatar
JK's avatar
Kristina's avatar
Heidi Gimness's avatar
370 Likes∙
19 Restacks
370

Share this post

Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts
Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts
Walensky wins the IDSAs Fauci Award
38
19
Share

Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kiki R's avatar
Kiki R
Oct 24

When I read the title, I thought this was satire and that the Fauci Award is a satirical disgrace award.

Expand full comment
Like (62)
Reply
Share
1 reply
John Linder's avatar
John Linder
Oct 24

My immediate reaction to the Fauci Award was that this is an insulting gesture, not a real award.

Expand full comment
Like (37)
Reply
Share
1 reply
36 more comments...
UK Now Reports Myocarditis stratified by Age & Sex After Vaccine Or Sars-cov-2
Nature Medicine paper revisited: And it is shocking
Dec 26, 2021 â€¢ 
Vinay Prasad
565

Share this post

Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts
Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts
UK Now Reports Myocarditis stratified by Age & Sex After Vaccine Or Sars-cov-2
27
Is seed oil better than butter? A new paper says YES, but is the paper any good?
JAMA IM publishes anti-MAHA research, but is it good science or dirty politics?
Mar 13 â€¢ 
Vinay Prasad
363

Share this post

Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts
Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts
Is seed oil better than butter? A new paper says YES, but is the paper any good?
62
Mask studies reach a new scientific low point
MMWR appears to no longer be in the science business
Feb 6, 2022 â€¢ 
Vinay Prasad
560

Share this post

Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts
Vinay Prasad's Observations and Thoughts
Mask studies reach a new scientific low point
48

Ready for more?

© 2025 Vinay Prasad
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Create your profile

User's avatar

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.