I found your substack via Aaron Sibarium who re-tweeted your tweet. Thank you for the analysis.
As you mention, he is a good reporter and I wondered how the data for the UCLA column were standing up. Yet the reason I trust the initial thrust of his column is far more detailed data from the Harvard case. And what is portrayed as happening …
I found your substack via Aaron Sibarium who re-tweeted your tweet. Thank you for the analysis.
As you mention, he is a good reporter and I wondered how the data for the UCLA column were standing up. Yet the reason I trust the initial thrust of his column is far more detailed data from the Harvard case. And what is portrayed as happening at UCLA is keeping with general patterns.
Would be wonderful if UCLA med school released anonymized and honest data on admissions. But doubtful that will happen. That such an august school also responded to a serious charge so evasively speaks poorly of its administration--not the majority of its faculty, I sense.
I found your substack via Aaron Sibarium who re-tweeted your tweet. Thank you for the analysis.
As you mention, he is a good reporter and I wondered how the data for the UCLA column were standing up. Yet the reason I trust the initial thrust of his column is far more detailed data from the Harvard case. And what is portrayed as happening at UCLA is keeping with general patterns.
Would be wonderful if UCLA med school released anonymized and honest data on admissions. But doubtful that will happen. That such an august school also responded to a serious charge so evasively speaks poorly of its administration--not the majority of its faculty, I sense.