Of course he is wrong but *even if he were right* look at how he describes it, as a close call kind of thing that involved weighing the "deleterious consequences" of school closures against assorted second-order health concerns like Long Covid in kids...
Um, NONE of that was tone while it was happening. Instead we got "quick and devasta…
Of course he is wrong but *even if he were right* look at how he describes it, as a close call kind of thing that involved weighing the "deleterious consequences" of school closures against assorted second-order health concerns like Long Covid in kids...
Um, NONE of that was tone while it was happening. Instead we got "quick and devastating" takedowns of the Great Barrington Declarations, "follow the Science" and if you didn't everyone was going to die. This is all so ridiculously dishonest.
Great comment. It’s increasingly difficult (IMO) to give Fauci any “benefit of the doubt” given his prominent role in the merciless suppression of dissent and debate. Ridiculously dishonest, indeed. Perhaps even murderous.
Of course he is wrong but *even if he were right* look at how he describes it, as a close call kind of thing that involved weighing the "deleterious consequences" of school closures against assorted second-order health concerns like Long Covid in kids...
Um, NONE of that was tone while it was happening. Instead we got "quick and devastating" takedowns of the Great Barrington Declarations, "follow the Science" and if you didn't everyone was going to die. This is all so ridiculously dishonest.
Great comment. It’s increasingly difficult (IMO) to give Fauci any “benefit of the doubt” given his prominent role in the merciless suppression of dissent and debate. Ridiculously dishonest, indeed. Perhaps even murderous.