3 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Suzanne Renard's avatar

Yes, thanks for noting this. As "smokegetsinyoureyes" mentioned, publishing pressure demands the de rigeur praise for the medical machine very prominently declared. It's the "open sesame" password needed even to get in the door to say something which is undeniably true.

Vinay has put himself out there to tell the truth about many aspects of the murderous first phase of the Plandemonium--he spoke out about the folly and harms of masking and pointed to the harms of the shots early on. I applaud and thank him for this!

Sadly, though, many in the VaccinesUberAlles camp will not read past that opening tithe paid to the church of chemical "health" management.

Expand full comment
mimi's avatar

If the article for a drug is favorable, I would expect some praise. But calling this trash "miraculous" in 2024 is over the top. And its efficacy was way overstated....Vinay should know that by now. Praise them if it's necessary but is it necessary to kiss their behinds?

Did it save some lives? Possibly. But how many old people died from it, since that seems to be the group that Vinay thinks benefited? We don't know the numbers on any of this so how can we conclude anything about its value?

I appreciate Vinay's opinions. Otherwise I wouldn't pay to read his substack. But many of us are still waiting for him to come around to understand the real problems with this vaccine and not just for young men and children.

Expand full comment
Bart Ingles's avatar

Perhaps one could read it as sarcasm.

Expand full comment