Is there not innately less bias in something that is less financially lucrative? For example, i have seen the functional medicine community furiously debate various forms of b12, no one benefits financially from this conflict. Doesnt that imply authenticity (if not evidence)?
Is there not innately less bias in something that is less financially lucrative? For example, i have seen the functional medicine community furiously debate various forms of b12, no one benefits financially from this conflict. Doesnt that imply authenticity (if not evidence)?
Is there not innately less bias in something that is less financially lucrative? For example, i have seen the functional medicine community furiously debate various forms of b12, no one benefits financially from this conflict. Doesnt that imply authenticity (if not evidence)?